Loading stories…
Loading…
Loading Civic Directory…


NMDOJ

Multi-State Effort: New Mexico Joins Lawsuit Aimed at Protecting Childhood Immunizations

The lawsuit challenges a January 5, 2026 CDC “Decision Memo” that stripped seven childhood vaccines – those protecting against rotavirus, meningococcal disease, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, influenza, COVID-19, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) – of their universally-recommended status.

Source: NM Department of Justice

Albuquerque, NM – Attorney General Raúl Torrez joined a multistate lawsuit today challenging the Trump Administration’s radical overhaul of the nation’s childhood immunization schedule. The complaint, filed today, names Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (RFK Jr.), Acting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Jay Bhattacharya and both organizations. The coalition alleges that RFK Jr. and the CDC bypassed federal law, ignored scientific evidence, and endangered children by gutting recommended childhood vaccines.

The lawsuit challenges a January 5, 2026 CDC “Decision Memo” that stripped seven childhood vaccines – those protecting against rotavirus, meningococcal disease, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, influenza, COVID-19, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) – of their universally-recommended status. The complaint also challenges the unlawful replacement of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the expert federal panel that has guided U.S. vaccine policy for decades.

Subscribe to the Daily Las Cruces Digest

* indicates required
How would you like to be addressed in personalized emails?

Intuit Mailchimp

“For decades, our nation’s vaccine policies have been guided by rigorous science and medical expertise, helping eliminate diseases that once devastated families,” said Attorney General Raúl Torrez. “By bypassing federal law and undermining established vaccine recommendations, this administration is putting children at unnecessary risk. Public health decisions must be driven by evidence — not ideology.”

The plaintiff states are asking the court to declare the Kennedy Schedule and the Kennedy ACIP appointments unlawful, and to enjoin, vacate, and set aside both the new immunization schedule and the unlawful appointments.

According to the 2024 CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, researchers have estimated that among children born in the U.S. between 1994 and 2023, routine childhood vaccinations prevented approximately 508 million cases of illness, 32 million hospitalizations, and over 1.1 million deaths, generating $2.7 trillion in societal savings.



In June 2025, Secretary Kennedy abruptly fired all seventeen ACIP voting members and replaced them with individuals who lack the scientific qualifications required by ACIP’s own charter and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). At least nine of the thirteen current ACIP members lack the expertise or professional qualifications required for the role, and a majority have publicly expressed views aligned with Secretary Kennedy’s well-documented opposition to vaccines.

In December 2025, the reconstituted ACIP reversed nearly thirty years of CDC policy by eliminating the recommendation for a universal hepatitis B birth dose—a vaccine that is up to 90 percent effective in preventing perinatal infection when administered within 24 hours of birth.

January’s “Decision Memo” that demoted seven vaccines was not based on any new scientific evidence, any recommendation by a lawfully constituted ACIP, or any systematic review of the available data. Instead, it relied primarily on superficial comparisons to purported “peer countries”—particularly Denmark—while ignoring the fundamental differences between those nations and the United States, as well as the overwhelming evidence supporting the effectiveness of the CDC’s pre-Kennedy childhood immunization schedule. Additionally, in contrast to countries like Denmark with universal healthcare, more than 100 million Americans lack usual access to primary care, making the instruction to “discuss vaccines with your clinician” essentially meaningless.

Lower vaccination rates will in turn lead directly to higher rates of infectious disease. For New Mexico and other states, this means a greater strain on state Medicaid programs and public health systems, more time and money spent combatting outbreaks and misinformation, and wasted resources decoupling state laws, regulations, and public guidance from ACIP’s and CDC’s now-untrustworthy recommendations.

Contrary to Secretary Kennedy’s misinformation and insinuation, vaccines previously recommended on the CDC’s pre-Kennedy childhood immunization schedule remain safe and effective, and they are critical for protecting America’s children and public health at large.

This lawsuit is co-led by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes and California Attorney General Rob Bonta. Attorney General Torrez joins the attorneys general of Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, and the Governor of Pennsylvania in joining the lawsuit.

Complaint

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading